Nov 9, 2008

Educational Links on Photovoltaics and Solar Energy

Where would be the best place to get an update of solar energy conversion, and photovoltaics in particular? That would be in a classroom, where you can ask questions and sort through the multiple topics of materials, sources of photovoltaic action (drift, diffusion, electrokinetic phenomena), and the difference between a cell, module, and an array. You would also be able to see that PV is only a tiny segment of an otherwise broad portfolio of technologies to make use of the sun for heating, cooling, making chemicals, making electricity from turbines, and so on. I offer two core courses at Penn State that deal with these subjects, but obviously there is a larger audience out there that would like information. Thankfully, we will be producing a web-based course dealing with photovoltaics, but that will be about a year off.

Therefore, I would recommend two web-based books for the curious, right now! The first is an educational project that began as an international collaboration between the University of Delaware and the University of New South Wales, funded by an IGERT grant. The site is called Photovoltaics: Devices, Systems and Applications CD-ROM, and the authors are Christiana Honsberg and Stuart Bowden. This includes interactive diagrams, movie clips of the silicon manufacture process, and a good review of solar energy. You will need to download Shockwave from Adobe. Up until recently, the Shockwave addition did not work for Macintosh systems, so I was more hesitant at recommending the site. But now: go for it! You will be busy for weeks. Note that the site is dedicated to silicon devices, and will not provide a comprehensive description of thin film PV devices and the principles of operation. That being said, the site is a gem.

The second book is not as web savvy, but does contain fantastic fundamental information on solar energy conversion. The resource is Power from the Sun by by William B. Stine and Michael Geyer, at California State Polytechnic University in the USA and IEA SolarPACES in Spain. This text is more like the classic paper text by John Duffie and William Beckman: Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, in which multiple solar energy conversion technologies are described.

There you go, solar energy enthusiasts! Go to school and get informed on solar energy. But if you are tied up with other things (like life), in the mean time do some winter reading and find out how much potential solar energy has as a sustainable technology!

Aug 31, 2008

More Photovoltaics to come...

It looks like there is interest in the principles of photovoltaics. I will be reviewing and revising my older posts on the subject in the next few days. Come back shortly for more!

Aug 2, 2008

Photovoltaics: Levels of Irradiance

Let’s talk about light interacting with a semiconductor to yield electricity. Today’s topic is to distinguish between low levels of irradiance and high levels of irradiance. Effectively, we are asking for an estimate of the concentration of photons being delivered from a high energy source to a low energy absorber/collector.

When we say low levels of irradiance, we are estimating a scale of light concentration that is typical of the diffuse and direct component of unconcentrated “global” or “total” solar radiation, or the light from a standard incandescent lamp or fluorescent lamp. This could be anywhere <1000 mW/cm2, or 10x the sun’s concentration (remember, this is just a crude scale, not a hard and fast rule--don’t take this back to your classes). The standard for testing solar cells inside the earth’s atmosphere is called Air Mass 1.5 Global (AM 1.5G), because the light from the sun passes through 1.5 lengths of a generic Earth’s atmosphere to generate a convenient irradiance of ~ 100 mW/cm2. Low levels of light such as this provide a sufficient number of photons (packets of light) to excite the electrons into an unoccupied level of energy (the conduction band). However, the population distribution of the majority carriers does not change significantly. That’s okay: the key player in a photovoltaic absorber is the minority carrier (n-type semiconductor: a hole; p-type semiconductor: an electron), and the population of minority carriers does change significantly with light absorption. Minority carrier transport gets the job done, in fact, because they are the limiting rate in the absorber reactor. You can find out more about charge carriers and carrier transport in the Photovoltaics CDROM from Honsberg and Bowden, Chapter 3 (although it doesn’t work completely for Macs, sadly)

What is high irradiance? You’ve heard the warnings about strong lasers pointing into others’ eyes? A laser is a coherent, collimated light source (the photons’ waves are in phase and heading the same direction), such that the photons can be very concentrated. If sufficient numbers of photons are absorbed by a semiconductor, the population of photoexcited charge carriers can be much greater than the majority carriers, and there a population inversion occurs, leading to stimulated emission (Light Amplification by Stimulated Emission of Radiation).

The photons from light bulbs and suns are neither coherent nor collimated, although they can be concentrated significantly to potentially cause a population inversion and stimulated emission (yes, there is the possibility for a solar laser). However, before that stage there are other phenomena that occur, making it a bit more complicated.

Concentrating cells allow an increased flux of photons to the smaller receiver/absorber using a larger aperture to collect the solar light. The geometric concentration ratio is the ratio of the area of an aperture to that of the absorber (C=Aapt/Aabs).1,2 For a perfect concentrator (as a point on the surface of Earth), the radiation from the Sun on the aperture-receiver assembly is only a fraction of the total radiation emitted by the Sun, given a half-angle subtended by the Sun of 0.27°. Assuming a blackbody, the absorber would have a maximum theoretical concentration ratio of 45,000 (for a circular concentrator) or 212 (for a linear,trough concentrator).1 The higher the concentration,the higher the photon flux (including increasing temperature),and the more precise the optics of the collector must be to deliver. This is an extreme energy flux for any semiconductor. Under high illumination levels, one will observe a decrease in minority carrier lifetimes and related diffusion path lengths. However, 45.6% of the suns power is contained in the infrared band (the part that makes things "hot"). Thermally, an imaging concentrator (C>> 10; analogous to camera lenses) can produce temperatures from 500 to 1500 °C at the absorber.2 This increased temperature can be used to drive thermal work (steam generation) or thermophotoelectrochemical reactions for concentrating solar power (CSP, not to be confused with CPV), but is not necessarily good for photovoltaic performance. High temperatures tend to decrease the efficiency of a photovoltaic device. In particular, this is why members of the microelectronics industry are getting into the concentrating photovoltaics field (CPV)--they know how to cool superhot microelectronics, and will do the same with CPV devices.

It is so interesting to see how this is all a great spread of possibilities that one can derive from our nearest fusion reactor!



Text sources:
1. Rabl, A. Active Solar Collectors and Their Applications. 1985 Oxford University Press, New York

2. Duffie, J. A.; Beckman, W. A. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. (3rd Ed.) 2006 John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, NJ, USA.

3. Andreev, V. M.; Grilikhes, V. A.; Rumyantsev, V. D. Photovoltaic Conversion of Concentrated Sunlight. 1997, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, England.

Jul 23, 2008

Surfing more and more photovoltaics!

In just a few years since returning from France in 2006, I have noticed some significant improvements in the world of PV within the United States. In fact, it seems that there is a wave of solar development and deployment that is rolling across the country!

Let me preface this glowing remark by commenting that not all was so great even two or three years ago. I had been working for a year in a laboratory in France that specialized in basic research for silicon and eta-cell (extremely thin absorber) thin film photovoltaic devices. While there, I was working with members of industry, the French government and power company, and the French national lab system. It seemed that there was a great vertical integration of research, industry, and deployment in France (and even more occurring in Germany). It was therefore a bit of a let down to return and learn how far behind the US was in terms of this integration. Yes, there are two major centers for research in Colorado (NREL) and Florida (FSEC), but as a national whole, the system seemed a bit worn, frumpy, and patchwork in nature. In truth, the USA went through about a 25 year period where not much was visible at all in solar research. The funding had dried up, leaving room only for the biggest four or five names in materials research and computer simulation (who supplemented their funding with studies in refrigeration). Now, many of the notable solar researchers are either retired scientists, microelectronics specialists, or emeritus professors.

However, in the two years since I returned there has been a dramatic bootstrapping occurrence. Just as we are looking to “next generation” PV technology, so are we seeing “next generation” researchers, educators, and industrial developments! Gunther Portfolio is a great blog for keeping us informed about developments for investing, and SolarBuzz and PVNews/Greentech Media also have regular installments of more and more PV industry growth.

In education, Penn State launched a new Spring 2008 course from the Dept. of Energy & Mineral Engineering, focused on solar energy conversion (with emphasis on photovoltaic conversion). Penn State also has plans to develop another more hands-on course in photovoltaics for extended education in the near future. Prof. Tonio Buonassisi of MIT has also announced a course in photovoltaics set for this Fall 2008 semester. The students have spoken, and they want more information on the current state of the art in solar and photovoltaics!

In the federal government realm, we are still sadly lacking a signal to encourage PV via incentives. The residential tax credit is slated to expire at the end of this year (following an extension). You will find much better luck for incentives on a state by state basis (see DSIRE). However, we did just receive a call to action by former Vice President Al Gore that may put more senators and representatives “in the mood” for renewable electricity generation. Also, the Solar Decathlon is to continue until 2015, the projected year for levelized cost of electricity generation from PV to be competitive with coal-fired electricity generation. The sponsor (DOE/NREL) projects half a billion visitors to the Mall area over a three-week period in September 2009, and anticipates global exposure to the Solar Decathlon concept to over one billion people. The Solar Decathlon is also exerting a viral effect on solar engineering and design, as it is inspiring similar competitions globally. Even now, a Solar Decathlon Europe is planned for 2010 in Madrid, Spain. The city of Beijing will be holding the 2009 Delta Cup – International Solar Building Design Competition, where the winning homes will be deployed in the earthquake-hit areas of Sichuan.

Keep up the good work, solar community! Let’s continue to work together to provide more information and more incentive for the broad public to adopt solar renewable energy. Of course, if a major component of that is photovoltaics, I would be pretty ecstatic!

Jul 2, 2008

What is disruptive technology?

Quick question: would you interpret quantum dots as disruptive technology for light absorbing solar energy, or concentrating solar power (CSP)? One is a fairly recent topic in the photovoltaic world, and the other has been around for over one hundred years.

A quantum dot is a nanoparticle in which the excited states (high energy electrons and holes) are "confined" by the very small dimensions of the particle. This leads to increased energy in the excited states (no where to go but up in energy), and has resulted in many new technologies. One proposed technology would use quantum dots as light absorbers for a photovoltaic effect, where one could collect mulitiple electrons (increased photocurrent) or very high energy electrons (increased photovoltage). The up side is that quantum dots sound sooo cool, why not make them into PV devices? The down side is that the rates of charge carrier extraction (collecting the electrons to do work) are still way too high to get much efficiency out of them. A lot of research needs to occur before you start seeing purely quantum dot PV. The disruption appears to be far away.

On the other side, if you concentrate the sun's power, you can use it effectively for multiple applications, and often you don't need radical new technologies. Rather, a combination of straight forward technologies in a new way may lead to something disruptive. You can concentrate the sun's visible light (48% of the suns power, or 656 W/m2) for photovoltaics, OR you can concentrate the sun's infrared light (45.6% of the total power, or 623 W/m2) and use the thermal heat to do work! Either way, by concentrating you take a diffuse source and, well, concentrate it. Certainly, you would need to cool a PV collector, but what about a thermal collector powering a turbine to generate electricity? In 1878, a solar power collector was exhibited at the World's Fair in Paris, France. Between 1907 and 1913, an American engineer (F. Shuman) developed solar powered hydraulic pumps with a concentration ratio of about 4.5:1.1

And the kicker, CSP is getting closer and closer to being the first economically viable solar technology--opening the doors to the following technologies? Is this disruption, by opening the possibilities of solar power beyond the single junction photovoltaic device?

1. D. Y. Goswami, F. Kreith, and J. F. Kreider Principles of Solar Engineering 2nd Ed. (2000) Taylor & Francis, Philadelphia, PA.

Apr 19, 2008

Natural Fusion recap

It has been a very busy semester at Penn State. I've served as the faculty director for the Solar Decathlon 2009 effort (Natural Fusion project), I'm developing a course in solar energy conversion, I'm establishing my materials research laboratory, and I'm the outreach and recruiting coordinator for my department. Even so, one of the fun aspects of my job is that so many things overlap each other, and there seems to be an unusually high rate of "moments of synchronicity". The class overlaps with the project, and the project helps with recruiting, and I've gotten to know more people on campus than I ever would have hoped for in my first year at University Park. What a blast!

In the Natural Fusion project, I have 15 amazing students serving as project managers from multiple colleges. They all have the vision and energy to turn this competition into a brilliant learning experience for integrated design, green building, and entrepreneurship. We also already have a team of over 100 (!) students that are helping in our design and marketing process.

I am also fortunate to have two other experienced faculty members deeply involved in the mentoring experience, and several more faculty available for support in the future. The team has been out to several industries seeking support in mentoring, materials, and direct funding--and things are looking very good. Even in the first four months, it appears that we will be testing and deploying many new technologies in photovoltaics and energy efficient materials. It's not without its stressful periods, but I feel that we have a really great thing going that will be both memorable and valuable to all of our futures.

Dec 11, 2007

Solar Decathlon...ho!

The Solar Decathlon is a progressive competition, offered to selected universities across the nation and outside of the USA every other year, in which students from multiple disciplines design and build a home completely powered by the sun. The focus of the competition is to combine BIPV (Building Integrated PhotoVoltaics) with new energy efficient architecture and its engineering systems. The competition was initiated in 2002 by NREL/DOE in conjunction with major sponsorship by British Petroleum, and the official two-year cycle was continued as of 2005 (SD2005).

The Decathlon operates within the general goals of the Solar America Initiative of the DOE, to make photovoltaic solar energy cost-competitive with conventional energy forms by 2015 (levelized costs of $0.10/kWh for PV). A major focus is to encourage relations between Academia and Industry for integrated design of photovoltaics within standard building practices. However, it includes the incorporation of the project into the curriculum of the students, as well as their involvement with industry. The Decathlon is projected to continue until 2015.

The winner of SD2007 was: Technische Universität Darmstadt. That’s correct; Germany won the USA solar home competition on their first try (why shouldn’t the biggest PV player in Europe be a strong competitor?). Perhaps this was an appropriate challenge to wake up integrated PV education in the states.

My own new home, Penn State University, took 4th place on their first attempt, Morningstar Pennsylvania. We’re looking forward to the opportunity to return and improve upon that standing in SD2009. It’s a great opportunity for students and faculty alike, and all products displayed in the Solar Decathlon homes are commercially available, which will make the project pretty interesting as the competitions progress to 2015.